There is a need for radical decarbonisation... However this challenge is compounded not only with the reality that over the next two decades there will be 2 billion more people living ever-more carbon-intensive lifestyles, but also by the challenge of reconciling poverty reduction (and economic growth) with deep decarbonisation.
At the very heart of the decarbonisation challenge is the simple question - who is responsible for what level of carbon reduction?
For example, should developing countries be able to increase their carbon emissions as part of their economic development? At a national level, much has been said about this notion of common-but-differentiated responsibilities (i.e., that everyone needs to take common responsibility for this global challenge, but with different levels of response). Less, however, has been discussed about allocating the remaining global budget amongst industrial sectors. This is a key issue, as businesses are both key contributors to climate change (releasing 49 Gt of GHG emissions each year) and also critical drivers for poverty reduction.
One tool to map out the pathway to a low-carbon future is the Sectoral Decarbonization Approach (SDA), which allocates the 2°C carbon budget to different sectors. This method takes into account inherent differences among sectors, such as mitigation potential and, critically, how fast each sector can grow relative to economic and population growth.
We have summarised below the reduction targets calculated for each of the 13 sectors, but there are three key take away messages:
For more information, please contact Jim Ormond or Jane Fiona Cumming at Article 13.
IRON AND STEEL SECTOR
CHEMICAL AND PETROCHEMICAL SECTOR
PULP AND PAPER
OTHER INDUSTRY (E.G. FOOD, BEVERAGE; TEXTILES, CONSTRUCTION ETC.)
LIGHT ROAD PASSENGER TRANSPORT
HEAVY ROAD PASSENGER TRANSPORT
RAIL PASSENGER TRANSPORT
AVIATION PASSENGER TRANSPORT
We just sent you an email. Please click the link in the email to confirm your subscription!
OKSubscriptions powered by Strikingly